![[Luis S.] v. Dudek, Acting Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (S.D. Fla. May 13, 2025) - SSR 24-2p & new 5-year rule regarding past work, assistive device, medical opinions](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0027/8170/8349/files/istockphoto-1405452812-612x612_e2be3184-7eed-4b39-bc24-4850e9379cf8.jpg?v=1716417501)
[Luis S.] v. Dudek, Acting Comm’r of Soc. Sec. (S.D. Fla. May 13, 2025) - SSR 24-2p & new 5-year rule regarding past work, assistive device, medical opinions
[Luis S.] v. Dudek, Acting Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:24-CV-22626, 2025 WL 1754675 (S.D. Fla. May 13, 2025) (Opinion by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman, by consent) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s Reply Brief; and court decision Topics addressed: RFC - assistive device Past relevant work – as generally performed Past relevant work – not performed at SGA level Past relevant work – 5-year rule Medical opinions – supportability Medical opinions – consistency Medical opinions – articulation requirements Remand for an award of benefits – entitlement clear from the record Rulings addressed: Social Security Ruling 96-8p Social Security Ruling 96-9p Issues briefed: 1) The step four determination is not supported by substantial evidence. 2) The residual functional capacity finding is not supported by substantial evidence. 3) The medical opinion evidence was not pr